Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Direct Anterior Approach (DAA) Suitable for all patients?

Not always. Complex anatomy, morbid obesity, or prior surgeries may make other approaches preferable.
Many patients walk the same day or within 24 hours. Patients report being able to walk without aids within days compared to weeks or even months after the posterior approach.
Yes, incisions are typically 8–10 cm and more cosmetically favourable.
On average, yes—but outcomes depend on surgeon skill and patient health.
Absolutely. Reduced dislocation risk and faster mobility are especially valuable in older populations.
No significant difference. Implant longevity depends more on prosthesis type and surgical accuracy.
The DAA is however technically demanding and has a long learning curve. A surgeon’s skill directly impacts recovery speed and complication rates. Technique variations exist, and outcomes depend heavily on surgeon expertise. When performed by experienced surgeons, complication rates are comparable or lower.
The choice of surgical approach in hip replacement profoundly impacts recovery speed, comfort, and quality of life. The Direct Anterior Approach stands out for its muscle-sparing benefits, reduced pain, shorter hospital stays, and earlier return to daily activities. While surgeon expertise and patient suitability remain critical factors, growing clinical evidence supports the anterior approach as a pathway to faster recovery and enhanced patient satisfaction.